Yuen, Kelley, Gelfman, Lindenberger, Smith, Arnold, Calton, Schell, Berns (2019) Development and Validation of the ACP-CAT for Assessing the Quality of Advance Care Planning Communication Journal of pain and symptom management ()
High quality advance care planning (ACP) discussions are important to ensure patient receipt of goal-concordant care, however there is no existing tool for assessing ACP communication quality. To develop and validate a novel instrument that can be used to assess ACP communication skills of clinicians and trainees. We developed a 20-item ACP Communication Assessment Tool (ACP-CAT) plus two summative items. Randomized rater pairs assessed residents' performances in video-recorded standardized patient encounters before and after an ACP training program using the ACP-CAT. We tested the tool for its 1) discriminating ability, 2) interrater reliability 3) concurrent validity, 4) feasibility, and 5) raters' satisfaction. Fifty-eight pre/post-training video recordings from 29 first-year internal medicine residents at Mount Sinai Hospital were evaluated. ACP-CAT reliably discriminated performance pre- and post-training (median score 6 vs. 11, P < 0.001). For both pre/post-training encounters, interrater reliability was high for ACP-CAT total scores (intraclass correlation coefficient or ICC = 0.83 and 0.82) and the summative items Overall impression of ACP communication skills (ICC = 0.73 and 0.80) and Overall ability to respond to emotion (ICC = 0.83 and 0.82). Concurrent validity was shown by the strong correlation between ACP-CAT total score and both summative items. Raters spent an average of 4.8 minutes to complete the ACP-CAT, found it feasible, and were satisfied with its use. ACP-CAT provides a validated measure of ACP communication quality for assessing video-recorded encounters and can be further studied for its applicability with clinicians in different clinical contexts. Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.