Deep Learning for US Image Quality Assessment Based on Femoral Cartilage Boundary Detection in Autonomous Knee Arthroscopy
Antico, Vukovic, Camps, Sasazawa, Takeda, Le, Jaiprakash, Roberts, Crawford, Fontanarosa, Carneiro (2020) Deep Learning for US Image Quality Assessment Based on Femoral Cartilage Boundary Detection in Autonomous Knee Arthroscopy IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control (IF: -1) 67(12) 2543-2552Abstract
Knee arthroscopy is a complex minimally invasive surgery that can cause unintended injuries to femoral cartilage or postoperative complications, or both. Autonomous robotic systems using real-time volumetric ultrasound (US) imaging guidance hold potential for reducing significantly these issues and for improving patient outcomes. To enable the robotic system to navigate autonomously in the knee joint, the imaging system should provide the robot with a real-time comprehensive map of the surgical site. To this end, the first step is automatic image quality assessment, to ensure that the boundaries of the relevant knee structures are defined well enough to be detected, outlined, and then tracked. In this article, a recently developed one-class classifier deep learning algorithm was used to discriminate among the US images acquired in a simulated surgical scenario on which the femoral cartilage either could or could not be outlined. A total of 38 656 2-D US images were extracted from 151 3-D US volumes, collected from six volunteers, and were labeled as "1" or as "0" when an expert was or was not able to outline the cartilage on the image, respectively. The algorithm was evaluated using the expert labels as ground truth with a fivefold cross validation, where each fold was trained and tested on average with 15 640 and 6246 labeled images, respectively. The algorithm reached a mean accuracy of 78.4% ± 5.0, mean specificity of 72.5% ± 9.4, mean sensitivity of 82.8% ± 5.8, and mean area under the curve of 85% ± 4.4. In addition, interobserver and intraobserver tests involving two experts were performed on an image subset of 1536 2-D US images. Percent agreement values of 0.89 and 0.93 were achieved between two experts (i.e., interobserver) and by each expert (i.e., intraobserver), respectively. These results show the feasibility of the first essential step in the development of automatic US image acquisition and interpretation systems for autonomous robotic knee arthroscopy.
Links
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31944954http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2020.2965291
